THE NACREALIA CUP SYSTEM

One cup.
Four coordinated functions.

Nacrealia is not a single “miracle coating”. It is a transparent product architecture in which body, mineral barrier, rim and lid are designed together—then validated separately.

Independent concept for material evaluation. Reference photography illustrates the cold-beverage experience and does not depict a finished Nacrealia prototype.

Cold beverage experience in a café setting

THE EXPERIENCE MUST REMAIN

01

See the beverage

Transparency remains part of selection, anticipation and enjoyment.

02

Trust the closure

Cup, rim and lid must behave as a single secure mechanical system.

03

Protect store rhythm

Stacking, de-nesting, filling and closure must suit real service speed.

Transparent cup and lid reference photograph

DESIGN OBJECT

The system must read as one clear object.

The engineering brief is deliberately familiar: transparent wall, reinforced rim, low-profile closure and controlled drinking geometry. The difference lies in how those functions are delivered.

Design target, not a performance claim.
Every feature remains tied to a measurable validation gate.

SCROLL-LED ARCHITECTURE

Built from the rim down.

Transparent lid and rim reference photograph
REFERENCE DETAIL • CLOSURE EXPERIENCE

01 • TRANSPARENT LID

Controlled drinking geometry

A shaped regenerated-cellulose lid with a raised drinking platform and controlled anti-splash aperture.

02 • SHELLLOCK™ SKIRT

Mechanical retention

Segmented folded geometry engages beneath the rim through controlled interference, reducing the strain demanded of a conventional polymer snap-fit.

03 • REINFORCED ROLLED RIM

Local stiffness and repeatability

A strengthened bead provides hoop stiffness, dimensional control and the retaining surface for the lid.

04 • TRANSPARENT CUP BODY

The load-bearing shell

Oriented regenerated cellulose supplies the principal structural wall while preserving beverage visibility.

BEVERAGE FIRST

Changing the material should not change the ritual.

Clarity, grip, cold hold and closure confidence remain the visible experience. The material architecture works quietly beneath it.

MATERIAL STACK

Structure inside. Mineral protection at the surface.

01

Oriented cellulose

Transparent regenerated cellulose provides the shaped structural shell.

02

Post-forming SiOₓ

An ultrathin predominantly inorganic mineral barrier is deposited on the beverage-facing surface after forming.

03

Protected interfaces

Adhesion, uniformity and resistance to handling remain explicit validation gates.

Depositing SiOₓ after dimensional stabilisation protects the brittle mineral layer from the large strains used to shape the cup while preserving optical clarity.

Engineering principle: use the least barrier material capable of passing the defined containment test.

MANUFACTURING LOGIC

Designed around controlled conversion.

01

Prepare the transparent cellulose sheet

02

Form the cup and lid geometry

03

Dry under constraint to stabilise shape

04

Deposit the post-forming SiOₓ barrier

05

Complete rim and ShellLock™ architecture

06

Inspect, stack and validate the system

The route remains a development hypothesis to be tested for forming damage, barrier continuity and commercial line speed.

PROTOTYPE ENGINEERING DRAWING SET · A–D

The cup architecture, made inspectable.

Four nominal TRL-5 geometry studies translate the concept into dimensions, load paths and functional interfaces. Select any drawing to inspect the full-resolution image.

Drawing A showing the overall nominal geometry of the Nacrealia 16 ounce cup
A · Overall 16 oz cupOverall height, rim diameter, wall draft, stacking shoulder and base geometry.
Drawing D showing Nacrealia base mechanics and load distribution
D · Base mechanicsDome, toroidal perimeter and standing foot distribute thermal and impact loads.
Controlled baseline: these drawings define nominal geometry. Where an earlier coating-thickness annotation appears in Drawings B or C, the current material baseline supersedes it: predominantly inorganic SiOₓ, deposited after forming at a target thickness of 20–60 nm.

EVIDENCE BEFORE CLAIMS

A credible concept must expose what could make it fail.

Clarity loss, SiOₓ microcracking, coating non-uniformity, flavour taint, weak wet stiffness, lid disengagement and slow conversion are treated as explicit engineering risks.

See the evidence gates  →